Saturday, April 23, 2011

http://www.onearth.org/blog/in-new-film-residents-of-the-gulf-say-impact-of-spill-persists
Excerpt:
In New Film, Residents of the Gulf Say Impact of Spill Persists
In the wake of the Deepwater Horizon blowout last year, BP repeatedly misled the public about how much oil was spewing into the Gulf of Mexico. Now, as we mark the one-year anniversary of the blowout, company executives would like us to believe that the spill has been cleaned up and the Gulf of Mexico is back to normal.
The people who actually live along the Gulf Coast tell us something different.
In a powerful new documentary airing on Saturday on Planet Green called "Stories from the Gulf," residents make it clear they are still suffering the aftermath of the largest oil spill in American history.


The movie is based on interviews produced by NRDC and Bridge the Gulf and recorded by Story Corps. I had the opportunity to provide the opening narration for the film, but most of the voices come right out of the Gulf.
Finally, the people whose voices were so often drowned out by BP's multi-million dollar PR machine have a chance to speak for themselves.
They describe the struggle to feed their families after fishing grounds were closed and tourism dried up. Captain Darla Rooks talks about the persistent rashes, headaches, and other illnesses she's experienced after coming into contact with oil and dispersants.
Rosina Philippe laments the dead porpoises and star fish she still washing ashore. Eric Tiser says, "I've been in the bayou my whole life, and ain't never seen so much dead stuff in the last six months."
These Gulf Coast Residents also worry what the spill will do to the future health of marine life. "My community is a fishing community," says Wendy Billiot. "And we're concerned about the long-reaching effects that the dispersants are going to have on the seafood. Are the fish going to continue to follow their life cycles? Are they going to grow past the larval stage? How much of all of these natural resources are going to be affected long-term? I think it's a lot of question marks."
Uncertainty weighs heavily on most of the people in the film. "I never thought at the time that it would impact us the way it has," says Ryan Lambert. "After 30 years of building the largest guide business on the Gulf Coast, here we are down 90-something percent, we're going to have to rebrand and put the perception that everything is fine. But how do you do that if you don't know that it's fine?"
Listening to people describe how much the bayou means to them, you realize how painful it must be not to know if their way of life can survive. But to know that the damage was wrought not by the caprice of a hurricane but by the greed and negligence of oil companies is just plain infuriating.
Numerous investigations, including President Obama's National Commission on the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, found that while BP, Halliburton, and Transocean made many reckless decisions before the blowout, the entire oil and gas industry lacks a culture of safety and risk assessment. The federal government, in turn, lacks the power and capacity to oversee offshore drilling.
The oil industry, the government, and Congress must take steps to strengthen the safeguards that protect workers and the Gulf environment. America, meanwhile, must reduce the addiction to oil that drives companies into ever riskier conditions, like the deepwater.
But even as we put these changes in place, we must not disregard the people on the frontlines of this spill. We must not minimize their struggle or the sense of loss and sorrow that persists to this day.
Instead, we should listen to what they have to say.
Don't miss Stories of the Gulf: tune in Saturday at 2:30 p.m. on Planet Green. Find Planet Green on your TV.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/11/22/robert-redford-bashes-al-gore
Excerpt:

Robert Redford Bashes Al Gore as Greedy Opportunist

Noel Sheppard's picture

As irrefutable evidence mounts that Nobel Laureate Al Gore's climate alarmism is about nothing other than lining his supposedly green pockets with green currency, manmade global warming skeptics around the world wonder when the former vice president's house of cards will collapse.
Without question, if Gore were to lose the support of almost universally adoring Hollywoodans, the scam would implode quicker than a Democrat demanding a recount after losing a close election.
As such, the following comments by actor and environmentalist Robert Redford, reported by the New Statesman last week, should bring hope to folks not buying the snake oil Gore is selling (emphasis added, h/t NB reader Lee):
Redford was an early convert to the environmental movement, and talks proudly of having campaigned on it since 1969. "It was not a happy easy time, because those were the days that the oil and gas companies pretty much controlled the show on propaganda. Anyone speaking about solar energy would be smashed down as being a radical, a tree-hugger and granola-cruncher or what have you."
He is notably cynical, however, about Al Gore's recent award of a Nobel Peace Prize. "He's making a lot of money, he's having a belle époque, a heroic moment," he says. "It must have been really hard for Gore to suffer all that [losing the presidential election], so he found another thing to come back with: the environment. He had a lot of money behind him, because in Clinton's administration there was a lot of money. With that he was able to build himself a new campaign and pick an issue. And he picked an issue that just happened to arrive at its moment in time." The less-than-subtle subtext is that Gore is an arriviste, while Redford has been out there, a grizzled loner, bearing the jibes and right-wing clobbering before the environmental cause was fashionable. Asked why he thinks Gore is not going back into politics, he says: "What's most important - to be a hero to your country and go save it . . . or do you want to be happy and rich and be a hero and not get into the political scene?"
NewsBusters readers know the answer to that question.
For those unfamiliar with some of the more obscure references in this piece, belle époque is French for beautiful era, and refers to a golden period in European history from roughly the beginning of the 19th century until World War I when the continent experienced an unprecedented string of peaceful years combined with improving technologies and standards of living.
An arriviste is defined as "a person who has suddenly risen to a higher economic status but has not gained social acceptance of others in that class." A more modern term for such a person is nouveau riche.
This is NOT a compliment.
With that in mind, is Gore's belle époque about to come to an end?
Those that adore democracy and capitalism should certainly hope so.

Excerpt:
Redford and his first wife Lola Van Wagenen divorced in 1985 but because the actor guards his privacy so closely it took almost a decade for this to be confirmed.
The couple had a son Jamie, now 46, and two daughters, Shauna, 48, and Amy, 38. They lost another son, Scott, to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.

http://www.thinktwice.com/sids.htm
Excerpt:
Vaccines and
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
Is There a Link?

      The Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute receives numerous emails every day. On this webpage you will find a small sample of these unsolicited personal letters linking vaccines to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). This webpage also includes a few studies linking vaccines and SIDS, plus an excerpt from the congressional records. Be sure to read the most recent reader emails as well, which include numerous vaccine questions, comments, concerns, and unsolicited personal stories.
Vaccine Safety Manual    For the most comprehensive information available about vaccines
   and the diseases they're meant to protect against, be sure to read:
   VACCINE SAFETY MANUAL
   352 Pages / Copyright © 2010
   Foreword by Russell Blaylock, MD
   More than 1,000 Studies





















SIDS STORIES:

      I am writing this to share my story of the effects vaccinations have had on my children. First, I would like to start off with my 3 living children. My son and my daughter both had reactions to DTaP on 2 occasions. I was told the first time that their reactions had nothing to do with the shots, so I allowed further vaccines. Upon recieving the 4th dose of DTaP, both of them had swollen, red, hard, and hot legs, and both were blistered at the sight of injection. I became very concerned at this point, but was told it was a minor reaction.
Less then a year later, I delivered my 4th child, a daughter. I noticed that anytime she was vaccinated she would spike a fever of 104.2F and had respiratory problems. Again, I was told this had nothing to do with the shots. I then read a vaccine book and this raised my concerns for my children when they were due to have more vaccines. I decided against further immunizations for my kids. My son is now going into kindergarten and I knew a requirement was that he have boosters. I attained a religious exemption form to avoid the shots and will do so for my girls as well.
Since the reactions of my children, I have been seeking more information about adverse effects of vaccines. On August 29, after an argument with my childrens' pediatrician about this subject, I came home and found your website. As I was looking through, I found where you linked SIDS with the DTaP. This is where my story becomes devastating. I had a child die of SIDS. After reading your information, I dug out his shot records and baby book only to find that he had the DTaP just 3 weeks prior to his death, and during those 3 weeks, my records show that I had him to the pediatrician 4 times for respiratory infection and 2 times to the emergency room for respiratory distress related to the "diagnosed" upper respiratory infections. These symptoms began within 2 days after the administration of the shot! [My son] was last seen in the E.R. for this reason. He died on November 1 of SIDS. I am convinced after my research that the DTaP is responsible for his death. Furthermore, the 3 precious children I have left will not recieve another vaccine!
I am grieving the loss of my son all over again, but I thank you because without having read your information I would have never known the link between vaccines and SIDS or any of the other new information I have learned, and could have been persuaded to continue to vaccinate the others. I am thankful for your insights, and am relieved to have the confusion of vaccinating over. I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that shots are not for my family, and not in their best interests. I have also concluded that the medical business is one big industry, a vicious cycle, to be blunt, a cycle to keep bringing in business by injecting heathy children with germs and toxic additives so that a percentage of them can come back and rack up more expense in X amount of years with cancers, immune disease etc. I also question now the diagnosis of my [first] son. He has been diagnosed with ADHD, and has consistent behavior problems. I will continue to search your sight, as well as others, to find the answers. If you have any statistics or ideas, I would appreciate that input. Again, thank you for your release of knowledge.

http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/vaccine_sids.htm
Excerpt:
Japan changed the start time for vaccinating from 3 months to two years and straight away their SIDS rate plummeted
 Raymond Obomsawin, M.D. - "Delay of DPT immunisation until 2 years of age in Japan has resulted in a dramatic decline in adverse side effects. In the period of 1970-1974, when DPT vaccination was begun at 3 to 5 months of age, the Japanese national compensation system paid out claims for 57 permanent severe damagevaccine cases, and 37 deaths. During the ensuing six year period 1975-1980, when DPT injections were delayed to 24 months of age, severe reactions from the vaccine were reduced to a total of eight with three deaths. This represents an 85 to 90 percent reduction in severe cases of damage and death."


http://www.vaccinationnews.com/scandals/feb_22_02/examples_of_resistance.htm
Excerpt:
Stories of resistance to reporting adverse vaccine reactions
Some examples of official resistance to acknowledging and/or reporting adverse vaccine reactions
Sophie's Story
For weeks, Sophie lay in this semi-alert stage. She didn’t have the strength to feed properly, she wouldn’t smile. She couldn’t focus her eyes, and did little more than squint her eyes in pain and lay in that state for hours on end. This was not the child I knew. At 2 months, before the shot, my daughter would smile and laugh, she could bring her legs straight and try to stand on my lap when I held her.
After the shot, her legs had 2 hard baseball sized black and blue lumps. She could barely move them. She would have these fits of choking for weeks.
I called up the doctor many times to report what was going on, they REFUSED to see her saying that this was just her personality and I was over reacting to “simple coughs”.
After 3 months of this horrible lifeless state, my daughter would slowly regain more and more movement and consciousness. When she finally smiled again, I promised myself and her that she would NEVER endure that horrible pain again.
The doctors office was refusing to report her reaction to VAERS, or even to write it down in her chart!!!!! I was furious, so I reported it myself.
Richie's Story in A Shot in the Dark by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fisher 
Janet asked the coroner why he could not state point-blank that Richie's death was due to a DPT shot reaction, when it was obvious.  She produced the Physician's Desk Reference (PDR) and read him the portion pertaining to pertussis vaccine reactions.  The PDR was one of the many medical references and scientific articles Janet had read since Richie's death.
"He (the coroner) said he couldn't write down on the death certificate that Richie had died from a DPT reaction because 'the state's standing on immunizations would be in an uproar'.  Besides, he said, it would be unscientific because the autopsy report was not specific enough about the cause of death.  At that point, we discussed the specific, scientific definition of SIDS.  Finally, he admitted that my son had died from 'irreversible shock' due to a 'probably reaction to DPT.'"
"We kept waiting for the state to send us an official death certificate and when we didn't get one, we called the town clerk's office and discovered that the official cause of death had never been filed by the coroner with the registrar.  After we gave the registrar the signed 'query of death' given to us by the coroner more than two months before, listing the cause of Richie's death, we received an official death certificate the next day."
Janet recently spoke to her county health commissioner and asked if the county was aware of the coroner's report and the official cause of Richie's death.  "The commissioner told me that she was not aware of the official cause of death, although she had heard that my son died soon after a DPT shot.  She admitted that there is no follow-up on the reports of adverse vaccine reactions or deaths immediately following immunization by state or county health officials,"  Janet said.
Amanda's Story
In October 2000 a very good friend of mine lost her one-year-old grandson within a week of receiving his MMR vaccination.

http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Vaccines-And-Sudden-Infant-Death-Syndrome
Excerpt:

Vaccines And Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

According to a Connaught vaccine manufacturer's data sheet for old style DPT vaccine,

'Sudden-infant-death-syndrome (SIDS) has been reported following administration of vaccines containing diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine. The significance of these reports is not clear. It should be borne in mind that the three primary immunizing doses of these vaccines are usually administered to infants between the age of 2 and 6 months and that approximately 85% of SIDS cases occur in the period from 1 through 6 months of age with the peak incidence at age 2 to 4 months.'

While they admit that SIDS has occured after vaccination with DPT containing vaccines, they attempt to brush it off by saying that that is because the majority of SIDS cases happen in the age range when vaccines are being given.

This isn't much of a defence, since it may be because of the shots that the SIDS occurs in that age group. Evidence suggests this to be the case (I'll discuss that further along in this article).

Later manufacturer's data sheets have become more mild in their interpretation of vaccine side-effects and many fail to mention SIDS, although they do admit to deaths after vaccination. According to Evans Medical, the Wellcome Foundation, product no. 0039/0474,

'Neurological events have occasionally been observed following the administration of pertussis-containing vaccines. The events reported do not appear to constitute a single, identifiable clinical syndrome but include isolated febrile convulsions, infantile spasms, episodes of persistent screaming and severe encephalopathy resulting in permanent brain damage or death. These events cannot be distinguished from those occurring in unvaccinated children of similar age. In the absence of a common, identifiable pathological mechanism, it is not possible to produce reliable estimates of the incidence of neurological events attributable to pertussis vaccination per Se.'

They state that severe screaming occurs, along with encepholopathy, permanent brain damage and death, yet attempt to brush that off by claiming unvaccinated babies have the same symptoms, which is pure nonsense.

1. Authorities have only ever done one double-blind controlled study on vaccination, in the 1970's, which showed more TB in the vaccine group. This type of study, which is the only type to get any answers of scientific value, has never been repeated. Doctors say that to withhold vaccines from children would be unethical, therefore they never study unvaccinated children.
'Unvaccinated' in their terms means children who have not had DPT containing vaccines, but have had other vaccines such as polio or Hepatitis B. It is known that ALL vaccines can cause screaming, encephalitis and death, so that would make it seem as if all babies are like that and it isn't down to the DPT.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh2000/stories/gore061899.htm
Excerpt:
Health and AIDS activists accuse Gore of favoring drugmakers' profits over the lives of millions of South Africans infected with the human immunodeficiency virus, which causes AIDS. They say Gore, in talks with South African President Thabo Mbeki, has threatened trade sanctions if South Africa permits the widespread sale of cheaper, generic drugs that would cut into U.S. companies' sales.
"Vice President Al Gore is doing drug company dirty work," the group AIDS Drugs for Africa says in fliers distributed at Gore's appearances.

http://www.vaccinetruth.org/page_9.htm
Excerpt:
According to Harris Coulter PhD, “Crib death” was so infrequent in the pre-vaccination era that it was not even mentioned in statistics.  It started to climb in the 1950s with the spread of mass vaccinations.  So much so it even acquired a new name-“SIDS,” Sudden Infant Death Syndrome of unknown origin. The medical establishment assures us that SIDS is unrelated to vaccines which begs the question; How do you know its not vaccines if it is of unknown origin? The three primary doses of DPT are given at two, four and six months of age. Eighty-five per cent of SIDS deaths occur from one to six months of age, with the peak incidence from two to four months. Another coincidence?
In a recent study of SIDS, breathing was monitored before and after vaccination. The data clearly showed that vaccination caused an extraordinary increase in episodes where breathing either nearly ceased or stopped completely. This is why it is so important to have our babies sleep on their backs, if you plan on vaccinating. It is easier for them to breath. Another problem associated with breathing is Asthma. Vaccinated children are shown to be five times more likely to become afflicted with this serious respiratory ailment. 
Dr. William Torch of the University of Nevada School of Medicine did a study of 103 children who died of SIDS. He found that more than two-thirds had been vaccinated with DPT prior to death. Of these, 6.5% died within 12 hours; 13 % died within 24 hours; 26% died within 3 days; and 37, 61 and 70 % within 1,2,3 weeks respectively. Anything that happens to a baby after four weeks is considered God-given. The average time it takes for a vaccine to dissipate in the body is 10-12 days. Click here for Dr Buttram's explanation. Even if a baby dies immediately after a vaccination the cause of death will be labeled SIDS. Here is one example in the vaccine adverse reporting system.

http://www.whale.to/drugs/babies_calpol.html
Excerpt:

Giving babies Calpol or other forms of paracetamol 'doubles the risk of them developing asthma and allergies'

By Sophie Borland
Last updated at 12:08 AM on 30th November 2010
Children three times more likely to get hayfever if they have paracetomol as infants, research shows
Babies given Calpol or other forms of paracetamol are twice as likely to develop asthma, research shows.
Those fed the medicines in the first 15 months of their life are also at much higher risk of suffering from allergies when they are older.
Researchers believe that the surge in childhood asthma in the last 50 years may be linked to increasing numbers of parents giving their children paracetamol for pain or fever relief.
A study found that babies who had Calpol or similar medicines in the first 15 months were twice as likely to have suffered wheezing and other symptoms of asthma by the time they were six.

http://way2online.com/?p=106938
Excerpt:
Paracetamol doubles risk of asthma in kids
on November 30th, 2010



Paracetamol-doubles-risk
Babies given Calpol or other forms of paracetamol are twice as likely to develop asthma.
Those fed the medicines in the first 15 months of their life are also at much higher risk of allergies when they are older.
Researchers attribute the surge in childhood asthma over the last 50 years to increasing number of parents giving their kids paracetamol for pain or fever relief, the journal Clinical and Experimental Allergy reports.

http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/27696
Excerpt:
While the Pan scandal raises questions about the adequacy of government regulation of the pharmaceuticals industry, it also highlights the dangerous irrationality of the capitalist system — a system in which the health needs, lives and livelihoods of the vast majority of people are subordinated to the relentless drive to maximise corporate profits.
The livelihoods of Pan's employees and the socially useful productive facilities that their labour has maintained should not be allowed to be destroyed because of the greed of the firm's capitalist owners. The company should be taken into public ownership and operated to meet the public's health needs, with the safety of its manufacturing processes verified by a quality control board elected by its employees.

From Green Left Weekly, May 7, 2003.

No comments:

Post a Comment